Stop the Cheering
by Deal Hudson
I was stopped in the hallway at CNN yesterday by a well-known Catholic newscaster who asked me, "Why are the liberals cheering the fall of Cardinal Law?" This comment comes from someone who unabashedly describes himself as a "leftie." I told him, sadly, that the cheering on the left is being echoed by at least as much cheering on the right.
The downfall of a bishop, regardless of the reasons, hurts the Church and ought to be an occasion of regret for all Catholics. But how many people are using the present scandal to advance their personal agendas? Some on the left want to argue that celibacy should be jettisoned and that women priests would help solve the situation. On the other hand, many on the right are bragging that they've "been right all along" about the homosexual infiltration of the clergy.
The extremes, both on the left and right, meet on a common ground that's more fundamentally dangerous for the Catholic faith than the pedophile scandal itself: They represent Catholic ideologues who consider bishops authoritative only when and if the bishops do their bidding.
To be Catholic means recognizing the authority of an ecclesiastical position, not a person. The sad spectacle of a cardinal on the cover of the daily newspaper covered in shame cannot cause us to lose respect for the office he holds.
Just as the Eucharist is still valid when celebrated by a sinful priest, so the authority of the office of bishop is not lost, though he may lose his personal moral authority. The ecclesial authority of a Catholic bishop isn't based on popular opinion, or especially on opinion polls.
All of this points to the obvious fact that the Church is a hierarchal institution. Chains of command and authority run vertically rather than horizontally. When problems arise-no matter where they're first addressed-they'll only be solved when the Church decides to clean its own house.
What must happen now is a Vatican-directed reform of management practices, vocational screening, and seminary formation in the U.S. Church. This can be at least partially based on the expertise of lay people. But lay involvement should be understood as the use of genuine management expertise as opposed to changing the received teaching on faith and morals.
The individual Catholic may disagree strongly with this or that bishop; he may even think certain bishops are doing a bad job. But, that same Catholic who criticizes the opinions and performance of bishops must also know that the very existence of bishops is what keeps the hostile secular world from overwhelming the Church.
And anyone who foolishly weakens the power of the bishops also weakens the Church.
In the case where a bishop's loss of credibility and moral integrity is so great that it damages the position he holds, then Rome itself must act. In doing this, the Vatican protects people of faith from the temptation to lose their faith.
The current scandal was created by bishops and priests more interested in preserving the reputation of the Church than protecting its children. The Vatican must now step in, or else the editorial board of the Boston Globe will dictate the reforms of the U.S. Church.
Deal W. Hudson is the director of the Morley Institute, and is the former publisher of CRISIS Magazine, a Catholic monthly published in Washington, DC. His articles and comments have been published in The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Washington Times, Los Angeles Times, National Review, Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Village Voice, Roll Call, National Journal, The Economist, and by the Associated Press. He appears regularly on television shows such as NBC Nightly News, One-on One with John McLaughlin, C-Span's Washington Journal, News Talk, NET's Capitol Watch, The Beltway Boys, The Religion and Ethics Newsweekly on PBS, and radio programs such as "All Things Considered" on National Public Radio. He was associate professor of Philosophy at Fordham University from 1989 to 1995 and was a visiting professor at New York University for five years. He taught for nine years at Mercer University in Atlanta, where he was chair of the philosophy department. He has published many reviews and articles as well as four books: Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend (Mercer, 1988); The Future of Thomism (Notre Dame, 1992); Sigrid Undset On Saints and Sinners (Ignatius, 1994); and Happiness and the Limits of Satisfaction (Rowman & Littlefield, 1996). His autobiography, An American Conversion (Crossroad, 2003), is available from Amazon.com.
